scarletmorgana

science-junkie:

Why trees can’t grow taller than 100 metres

TYPICALLY, the taller the tree, the smaller its leaves. The mathematical explanation for this phenomenon, it turns out, also sets a limit on how tall trees can grow.

Kaare Jensen of Harvard University and Maciej Zwieniecki of the University of California, Davis, compared 1925 tree species, with leaves ranging from a few millimetres to over 1 metre long, and found that leaf size varied most in relatively short trees.

Jensen thinks the explanation lies in the plant’s circulatory system. Sugars produced in leaves diffuse through a network of tube-shaped cells called the phloem. Sugars accelerate as they move, so the bigger the leaves the faster they reach the rest of the plant. But the phloem in stems, branches and the trunk acts as a bottleneck. There comes a point when it becomes a waste of energy for leaves to grow any bigger. Tall trees hit this limit when their leaves are still small, because sugars have to move through so much trunk to get to the roots, creating a bigger bottleneck.

Jensen’s equations describing the relationship show that as trees get taller, unusually large or small leaves both cease to be viable (Physical Review Letters, doi.org/j6n). The range of leaf sizes narrows and at around 100 m tall, the upper limit matches the lower limit. Above that, it seems, trees can’t build a viable leaf. Which could explain why California’s tallest redwoods max out at 115.6 m.

Source: New Scientist.
Images: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4

  1. linear-ahn reblogged this from filigranka
  2. filigranka reblogged this from poniatowskaja
  3. lordofthedoodleelves reblogged this from thehumblebanana
  4. thehumblebanana reblogged this from wvnterfell
  5. poniatowskaja reblogged this from wvnterfell
  6. flowerofmemory reblogged this from wvnterfell
  7. wvnterfell reblogged this from blood-pixels
  8. georgealexandrade reblogged this from science-junkie
  9. robotnoise reblogged this from anastasiusfocht
  10. anastasiusfocht reblogged this from verhkrys
  11. verhkrys reblogged this from supersorrel007
  12. mumpitzen reblogged this from science-junkie
  13. water0breathers reblogged this from science-junkie
  14. sabrina---bee reblogged this from bastetrip
  15. bastetrip reblogged this from science-junkie
  16. foolishvirgins reblogged this from science-junkie
  17. bloatshock reblogged this from nybg
  18. richclash reblogged this from nybg
  19. amazingsmelly reblogged this from nybg
  20. brandyrapid reblogged this from nybg
  21. unbeknownstlove reblogged this from science-junkie
  22. eerstehulpseo reblogged this from nybg
  23. bubblyfatuous reblogged this from nybg
  24. amusingchap reblogged this from nybg
  25. weszemel reblogged this from nybg
  26. amidstbutterflykisses reblogged this from pitchblackglow
  27. parallelcohort reblogged this from nybg
  28. nortonhumor reblogged this from nybg
  29. batioso reblogged this from science-junkie